I welcome and expect a flaming-I don't care. I also accept that I do not contribute directly to any informed debate-BUT I will redress the balance so long as NSF is involved-I admit to taking a personal dislike to his post-because they are so reminiscent of the attitude that put easy where it is today-weak, insipid, and above all WRONG for the last time.
This is not about who is better-as Mon. Man above states, its about what an individual wants.
Someone out there is hating, easyJet at the moment-is on a demographic line which has put them outside a BA, Virgin even Monarch and is at their wits end. So how is NSF post contributing to any informed debate.
So Mon. Man et al I am glad you are happy-I am happy-have a go-like I said I expect it-but contribute-expalin yourself and I ask you the question. What is so fantastic about the new man being in a crewroom at 6 in the morning and why does that mean things will improve?
Anyway I will throw my hat into the ring-If you want a superstable roster, good money-excellent aircraft AND promotions based on merit-assesments made in simulators and some excellent flying. No bull-no cosy chats, no building lego towers without talking then give Ryan a go. Just to be sure I am not waving the Ryan flag see it for what it is-you come to work-do your best and go home-no hassle and no orange bull.
On the question of turnover what do you expect in Loco.-a 25 year old poss. Captain or at least 3000 hours to not go and explore his/her possibilities. The retention of the old and infirm (me) and mortgaged is probably more of an indication of T&Cs because it indicates sustainability-and on a first past the post you can DO Ryan for longer than easy-but not for ever.