PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Proposed amendment of the ANO: Mode S
View Single Post
Old 6th Aug 2006, 12:17
  #13 (permalink)  
IO540
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a given 150nm flight in the south of England I might get 50 traffic reports (from say Farnborough/Brize/Shawbury) of which I guess 80% are "unknown level". How useful that is is a matter of opinion but it's an awful lot of resource wasted, on both the ATC and the pilot end of things.

From those that I do spot, and from the fact that I usually fly as high as I can without getting an IFR clearance into Class A (which complicates matters unnecessarily) I "know" most of them are way below me.

By "local bimble" I meant flight within a narrow range of one's airfield. With most UK airfields, one cannot venture very far in any one direction without reaching CAS. If Mode C was mandatory, you can bet that almost every plane that has a normal electrical system would have a Mode C fitted - simply because it would otherwise be all but useless for training or for self fly hire. If one had the US-style Mode C veils, while it would still be possible to fly a long way without needing a transponder, in practice one would choose to not restrict the utility of the plane to such a degree.

It's curious to observe that in America, often described as the land of aviation freedom, they have mandatory Mode C in the "obvious" places, while in Europe everybody has been fighting it.
IO540 is offline