Originally Posted by kansasw
Aviate you do not appear to have read the article you cite. I offer the following quote from it "If you are concerned about global warming (as I am) and think that human-created carbon dioxide may contribute (as I do)..."
There may be discrepancies with the hockey-stick mathematics, or they may have been resolved as others profess. In either case, your argument appears to be that because of alleged discrepancies in the hockey-stick calculation, the whole notion of human/fossil fuel contribution to global warming is out the window. Your logic there is, well, unconvincing to put it mildly.
I suggest that you are grasping at a thin straw to support what you would like to believe, and disregarding the preponderance of agreed fact and legitimate scientific opinion.
Your assertions are contravened, not supported, by your own evidence.
So you believe the 'Hockey Stick' is accurate?
Try my later post.....
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597 Aviate 1138