I did study and re-read HTBJ. Along with Ace the Technical Pilot Interview, Fly the Wing, ATP questions banks, various interview prep books and info on Hong Kong itself. Had the complete fleet and company history down. When I told them the type of things that I had used to prep, they elected to hardly ask me any questions about those subjects.
No questions about Cathay history or current fleet. No questions about current powerplants or thrust ratings.
Only one 747 related question, which I nailed.
Most of the questions that I knew I got right were still contested. Another American applicant was challenged on why he got a college degree and if that made him a better pilot. When he said 'I think it might make an individual more well rounded', they immediately asked him "so you think we do it wrong by not requiring a degree". How is that not confrontational and pre-conceived? How is it that even releviant?
VVJ makes my point for me. International experience with some form of international background. In no way am I saying he wasn't prepared, or an excellent candidate, just pointing out what seems to be and obvious trend to me. By the way, congrats on the second interview.
I know that I studied just as hard and got different interview. Maybe no one else is willing to say it, but I am. Good luck to all.
RF