t is your opinion that EU carriers should invest in training from the start, rather than hiring current and qualified airman to fill the seats of aircraft that are arriving on their property.
Like I said... a complete inability to grasp the argument. Nobody is suggesting training ab initio pilots - although many airlines do so, including the likes of Easyjet. The point is that Cityjet are taking US expats over type-rated and experienced European crews. See the second post on page 2.
More to the point... nobody is saying that it is wrong to allow expats to fly in Europe per se, simply that suitably qualified Europeans should be employed first (second post, page 2).
It does, however, make one wonder if the aircraft and the crews were a package deal...
Don't you think that once there are EU member pilots qualified to fill these seats that the expats' services will be terminated?
Yeah, right... see above. Why do you have so much trouble comprehending the argument?
But hey... then you can give up you exiled life in the South Pacific and come back to and fly in your home land.
Fool. I came here deliberately, for the same reason that you apparently went to Europe. Or was it because you weren't good enough to get a decent job in the US? That seems a more likely scenario.
If I were not a gentleman
You are, by no stretch of the imagination, any form of gentleman (or what passes for such in NYC).
Now if you must bore us with a response, please try to stick to the argument, and not spear off into misunderstanding and some spurious attack on a point that was never made in the first place. Can you manage that? or would you like me to list the points under discussion, yet again?
