I have found AFAP to be supportive, informative and responsive. At all times.
The LOL scheme is fantastic, and the only realistic way of me protecting my family becuase of the casual and contract work I do.
With all the vitriol expressed above it would be nice to air the specific grieviances against the responses of LC so that both sides of the arguement can be aired. It is a bit hard to defend against all encompassing sledges that contain accusations like not stepping "up to the plate" and then fail to produce any substantiation.
Stinky, I have admired some of your past work here on the prune, but you need some specifics to run with this one. If it is "confidential" then perhaps a call through to LC would solve it first?
Just a suggestion.