From what I have seen the ATP scheme offered by CTC for modular students seems like one of the most effective ways to get employed
Not been reading the previous umpteen pages, but GSB has annunciated the real issue:-
To all practical purposes, CTC stylee structured modular and OAT integrated achieve exactly the same thing, albeit with slightly different flying training requirements, and my assumption is that that is an e2e consistent single supplier, aptitude tested, adequately trained and examined student complete with a full paper train showing strengths and weaknesses. So has this anything to do with integrated really or everything to do with the recruitment service offered to both the student and to the employer? I suggest not. Perhaps we should categorise such structured, single supplier schemes as "Acadamy Flight Schools" or something, just so we don't get hung up on the "I" word.
If I am honest, if I were an Airline Chief Pilot, I would be somewhat motivated to find the best pilot for the least effort and risk. Could a pilot who has done a bit here and bit there really fulfil that requirement as well as a students history that is documented e2e by a single establishment?
With that in mind, I suspect the Oxford modular course fulfils that requirement 100%. What I do doubt for all but a few 'straight A' students is the quasi employment agency service.