Wasn't insulting anyone, as I said, I have no frame of reference to do so. I was referring to an earlier post, and the horror that it elicited and was trying to make a point about people springing to others defence without all the evidence. Clearly without knowing the facts it is inappropriate to make a definitive statement over whether or not certain Lords were informed or not when they voted.
All I said was that there was a chance some were motivated by factors other than the evidence put in front of them - this happens in politics all the time. But we have no way of knowing, do we?
Again, we are arguing without all of the evidence, which is what the HCSC and many on pprune think happened with the accident. Chill guys, I was not insulting anyone.