Walter,
Take a breath and slowly read this cut and paste from a recent Meadowbank post...
The only important point connected to your pet theory is that the equipment you describe was not fitted to ZD576 at the time of the accident and cannot have been even a contributory factor.
Once more now taking long and slow breaths
The only important point connected to your pet theory is that the equipment you describe was not fitted to ZD576 at the time of the accident and cannot have been even a contributory factor.
Now if you can, and I have no doubt you will, see anything even remotely ambiguous in the above please enlighten us. That is a clear and categoric statement from a miltary source that your theory is wrong and if you cannot see that then you really do need to seek help.
You also have, from Jayteeto, testimony that he witnessed FIRSTHAND that until the very last minute the HC1 was to be used but it went U/S. I have known the guy for years and there is no way he would make up this FACT!! Please explain how, if that was the case, your complicated scenario was suddenly put into action, unless you are trying to hint that the sudden unservicability of the HC1 and the associated compliance of all the groundcrew was part your conspiricy theory.
all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced
Last edited by Always_broken_in_wilts; 6th Jun 2006 at 20:07.