tallsandwich
appreciate your comments
Final 3 greens,
Agreed, however some reasoning/technical knowledge is surely better than for instance "chances are RAT will deploy"
Ruibik 101
Please dont waste our/ your time. we've heard that all before. If you read the thread, you will already see that I have accepted that thread title is poor and has encouraged alot of ridicule and nonsense.
I'll take this comment to be a request for the title to be varied a tad ...
I-Ford
Interesting, however I wouldn't say it is purely speculative to give a likely outcome to a BBJ in worst case NEMP/DEW damage. Maybe it is on an ACJ and that is the question I am interested in. Speculation is fine provided it is based on some technical reasoning and not just an opinion without any basis.
Just a reminder, this is not a debate on whether a nuclear detonation is likely or whether it is surviveable, or any other reason. It is purely to to discover the result of worst case NEMP/DEW on flight controls of ACJ and whether it is likely to be controllable.
If the nuclear explosion NEMP bothers you, forget about that and lets just consider DEW.