The Search function is not part of the argument you present. When stating something it can quite easily be supplemented by further fact or evidence within the same breath. To merely point someone to the search function allows you to make any claim where it's validity is the responsibility of the Search function. Of course if you require further or more in-depth information you can indeed utilise this function but in your case you wish to dismiss any form of reasoned debate or exchange of comments and hide behind some search option.
OAT IS A GOOD school it is certainly respectable but to have this tantrum of but we spent the most money on setup costs therefore we deserve to be No.1 elludes any practicla validation. Many corporates spend huge amounts of money but rarely if ever exhibit the same tantrum of "but we're OAT".... so? Like anyone and everyone OAT must heed to marketplace protocols, it's only natural.
Those that attend OAT are making ARE NOT making a BAD choice, however we it goes wrong is this 'aviation class system' where anyone going elsewhere is somehow branded inferior. I haven't slated OAT but cannot accept that they are immune from any reasoned argument which should be invited, which for the sums of money involved and commitment from student, partners, familiy, etc.