At what point and under what conditions should Return of Service "Training Bonds" be considered to be onerous and really defacto enslavement ?
While most would argue a company spends much getting its employees trained on the equipment it may operate and it is only fair they get a return for that investment at what point might it be argued that those Return of Service agreements constitute an unfair restriction to an employees rights?
What fair/ unfair experiences have Rotorheads had and how does the legal system in various countries relate to the practice?
Thanks
