O.K., since nobody else will - and especially because of the exceedingly polite request by iomapaseo. Apparently somebody has been found guilty of something in a secret meeting. However, for security reasons (to do with the war on something or other) they are only going to tell selected people on a "need to know basis". Excessive efforts to discuss the subject will be identified by the NSA using something called "neo-stocastic inductive inferential analysis" and boy will you be in trouble if they track you down using this painful technique.
In any case, is it not a fact that what happened will be irrelevant to the debate here? - so it hardly matters what happened. We will all start up again just where we finished up ... reheat our previous arguments and "keep on truckin" .... right? Why let the issue be confused by facts or, even worse, let them get in the way of a good rant?