ATPL(H) or CPL(H)?

[Martin1234]

I'm glad to hear that the UK CAA accept CPL(H) + IR(H) in lieu of ATPL(H) theory. However, it is not summarised in LASORS as Mr White says but it definately is in JAR-FCL.

Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 08:47:08 +0100
Subject: ATPL(H) theory

"It is a requirement to hold valid JAR ATPL(H) theory credit to qualify for
the grant of a JAR ATPL(H). This can be achieved by passing the JAR ATPL(H)
examinations or by holding a JAR CPL(H)/IR (having passed the JAR CPL(H) and
IR exams). This latter option is summarised under "credits" of the LASORS
section quoted in your original e-mail.

Regards

Simon White
Policy Section
PLD "


"To: <[email protected]>
CC:
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:29:26 +0100
Subject: Att: Policy

In accordance with JAR-FCL 2.285;

(...)"The holder of a CPL(H) and IR(H) satisfies the knowledge requirements
for the issue of an ATPL(H)"

However, in Lasors 2006 (page 291 in the PDF file) it says that ATPL(H)
theory credit is among other requirements necessary for the issue of an
ATPL(H), contrary to JAR-FCL.

Is this an error in Lasors? "