Just for info.
When BA closed NAPS to new members about 3 years ago, the unions were not very happy but did nothink, BA told the unions this would ensure NAPS will be ok in the long run.
No surprise that BA want to hack at NAPS now, it's obvious that the sooner they can force any changes to NAPS, the more cash they can save for in house payments to managers.
About 20 years ago, staff were advised by BA that leaving APS and going into NAPS would be good for the company, many did, I don't know of any staff looking back now thinking that a wise choice.
Did you know that under the changes made by Gordon, as of April 2010, NAPS members can't draw pension till 55 years of age, however APS members can draw at 50.
If BA wants happy workers, it should stop the BARP and let all staff into NAPS.
BA only mention cuts to NAPS.
Why don't BA just ask staff to pay more into NAPS and keep present terms and conditions.???
Last edited by Joetom; 15th May 2006 at 19:07.