Yep! Thats the one.
It clearly states there are two methods of release at the moment (caused by the ambiguity of EASA "Rules" which are then left to NAA interpretation for methods of compliance).
It is also quite obvious that many airlines would like to reduce the amount of well paid engineers and mechanics they have. If they could employ more lower paid, locally trained, personnel to become "Appropriately Approved Personnel" they would save a fortune.
My understanding of this method is that many personnel could carry out tasks without supervision leaving an "Engineer" to release the aircraft as the "Approved Personnel" state/sign they have completed their tasks. (Honest Guv'nor)
IMO many wheels have fallen off due to lack of supervision.
I have no doubt that, if left without argument, EASA will once more opt for the lower standard.