I seem to recall the phrase 'Unwarrantable Arrogance' being coined by a major player in this case. We now have contributor whose opinion he sees as fact despite the fact that numerous MPs, Aerospace specialists, a Scots Sherriff and an assortment of Lords (including eminent Law Lords) feel unable to raise such supposition to the status of fact.
Gentlemen, I fear that trying to argue the points with someone with such a closed mind who cannot see that he is raising his opinion to the status of fact is somewhat akin to feeding a troll. He conveniently sidesteps every direct question put to him so I suggest it may serve the thread better if he were just ignored and left to nurse his opinions.