Hi Ark
Just a quick one:
The BOI
actually said:
The Board were unable to establish whether breakfast was taken by Flt Lt TAPPER.
Only people like cazatou K52 seek to extend
absence of evidence, as
evidence of absence.
It is a tactic they are obliged to adopt in many areas, and that characterises their arguments, because the evidence
available cannot satisfy the standard
required!
Smearing the crew, in a non-factual way, is their only alternative to rational debate.
A debate they lose every time! Need I list the examples??