cazatou
You say that it was the BOIs assumption that this chart represented the crew's planning, and then challenge your opponent to prove that assumption wrong. Forgive me, but if this was an assumption, then it is no more an established fact than much of the other "evidence" here. If you are right, then the BoI had no business making assumptions on such an important point, and no one needs to prove them wrong to advance the case.
Forgive me again, but I have found both the content and tone of many of your recent posts increasingly bizarre.
There may well have been human error, or not, in this accident. None of us know, or will ever know. We should all understand, however, that there are insufficient grounds here to support manslaughter charges against the crew, which in effect is what the reviewing officers comments amounted to.
Regards
Ginseng