PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Middle engine placement
View Single Post
Old 12th April 2006 | 12:56
  #13 (permalink)  
barit1
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
The early CF6's were probably too long (although I don't fully understand that...), but about 1983 some L-1011 operators were shall we say fed up with the maintenance cost of the RB211.

Delta and All Nippon had large TriStar fleets and had bought early 767's with CF6-80A's, which were a foot shorter than earlier CF6's due to new combustor design.

So these two carriers were very interested in retrofitting the 1011 with CF6-80A's - but they couldn't achieve a critical mass to convince TWA or others to join them.
barit1 is offline