Catazou
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER THAT ANY FORM OF TECHNICAL FAULT WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CRASH.
No contributor to this thread has been able to PROVEa technical defect which contributed to, let alone caused, the Crash.
Neither is there conclusive evidence that a technical fault was
not the cause of the crash and the FADEC theorists merely put it forward as a possibility, most of them are content that will never be provable. The whole point is that the evidence as to what actually transpired is very limited and speculation as to technical faults is no more, nor less speculative than Wratten and Day's speculation as to gross negligence.
The technical fault theorists to my recollection have never claimed that their theories are facts, merely doubts. Only Messrs Day and Wratten advance their speculation to the status of fact.
The only broken rule that matters in this case is the one which stated that deceased aircrew shall only be found grossly negligent in cases where there is no doubt whatsoever.