YES I UNDERSTAND
I also understand the blatent disregard for ASI's shown by the Pilots in respect of crew duty time, nightstops out of Theatre, crew meals, outbriefs etc.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER THAT ANY FORM OF TECHNICAL FAULT WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CRASH.
No contributor to this thread has been able to PROVEa technical defect which contributed to, let alone caused, the Crash. A FADEC runaway would not itself have caused the Crash. The Pilots should have been able to climb to Safety Altitude or turn away from the Mull. The failure to do so would mean,if the "technical defect" theory is correct, that there was actually a triple defect preventing this which suddenly disappeared without trace in the mille-seconds before impact.
I find that "an untraceable defect" too far!
PS How many ASI's are you allowed to ignore before it ceases to be forgetfulness and becomes negligence?