Red Herring
Mr. Crofts past is a red herring. If CX knew about his past, maybe they would not have hired him. If they found out after the fact, there is a CX mickey mouse court he could have gone through. Instead, he and 48 employes we Fired/Terminated/Loss of Confidence/No Particular Reason or whatever on a single day. No procedures were followed.
Mr. Crofts was given a letter stating he was terminated for “No Particular Reason”. I believe some (possibly CX types or Mr. Croft haters or both) are now trying to find reasons for Mr. Crofts termination to justify his termination in the tribunal.
I am sure the Tribunal will look more at the situation surrounding his termination than what Mr. Croft has done in the past. Like I said, it’s a red herring.
Whether Mr. Crofts wins or loses this tribunal, it will be very interesting to see Cathay Laundry hanging for the employees and the world to see.
We are a caring company, to whom, I am not sure.