Met Form 215
Am I the only person who finds the new Met Form 215 difficult to interpret?
The graphics are lovely and clear, but the textual description is so complicated, with symbols and codes very densely packed. Then they try to economise on area references (A,B,C), so the symbols get jumbled up with lots that apply only to C1,C2 or C3.
I'm not against abreviated codes. TAF's and METAR's read well and are usually easily understood, but I think this Form 215 just tries to hard to abbreviate and get too much information into a couple of lines of code.
Did they really canvass GA pilots on this form?