Sure.You're right, it was just my way to shorten the message.
Situation goes like this:
- atc: rwy 33 clrd to land
- pil: we're cleared to land
- atc: line-up rwy 29 and wait
- pil: confirm line-up ?
- atc: affirm, line-up rwy 29, the arrival traffic is for rwy 33
- pil: lining-up.
- atc: behind landing a319 line-up rwy 33 behind and wait.
pilot readbacks correctly with no confusion.
That's the point - I don't know why, it's been more confusing to line-up another rwy (we almost ever use rwy designator), than the same as departure.