PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Even if we sort technology transfer, is JSF still the right aircraft?
Old 23rd Mar 2006, 07:52
  #16 (permalink)  
scottishbeefer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the land of the Yank, only the F-22 is considered a step-change aircraft - not JSF. However, the JSF is often quoted at being much cheaper due to the way costings can be slewed by including possible cuts in production, one-off development costs etc. The F-22 is far more at risk than the JSF in the US.

JSF is also still donating technology to F-22, particularly its SAR. It'll be the daddy of carrier aircraft for sure. You have to look at through-life costs. The STOVL will cost less in the long-run, end of dit, while still providing super-cruise etc.

We won't be buying any Grippens, but we are already nicking some tactics off 'em - eg passive/active attack etc.

Rafale is about as likely as me winning the lottery.
scottishbeefer is offline