I cannot believe that the arguments continue.
The entire senior intelligence cadre is aboard an aircraft that crashes - does anyone here really believe that sabotage wasn't considered?
Estimating aircraft speed by eye is impossible, especially over the sea without terrain to measure against and without the day to day experience of observation of the same aircraft type. The yachtsman is in no position to testify to the speed, never mind commenting on 'high speed'.
If the US SEALS were cooperating with the RAF in trials of special equipment it would not be discussed in open court or inquiry. In any case, even if true, a navaid would not cause an aircraft to crash.
There is still no explanation as to why the crew did not turn as planned to fly along the coast.
No further speculation is of any value because it cannot be carried further.
End of story. Now can we stop wasting bandwidth and concentrate on the campaign to get MOD to re-consider the findings?
FJJP