Mr Purdey.
We don't know because we weren't there. Mr Holbrook was, so why does everyone try to discredit his evidence, or assume that they know what he saw better than the man himself?
He is the last known eye witness. He is a precise, intelligent man who has explained what he saw, in an articulate way. It matters not one jot what any of us think Mr Holbrook saw.
Speculation and assumptions are best left to Reviewing Officers.
My best, as always.
Brian
"Justice has no expiry date" - John Cook