alfalpha, a FAF is associated with non-precision approaches. It is a positive fix.
A FAP, OTOH, is associated with precision approaches because it marks the position for commencement of the precision segment (ie glidepath). It is not, strictly speaking, a positive fix because the actual point of intercept will only be exactly the same as the nominal point if standard ISA conditions exist at the time of GP intercept. To a lesser extent, the point of interception can differ due to altimeter error or a higher altitude at the point of intercept (ie intercepting the GP further out than the nominal distance that's shown in the chart).
212man... there can be many other reasons. Firstly, it might've been an error in the chart produced by the State, which Jeppesen simply copied to ensure that their depiction is identical to the State's own depiction. Secondly, it could simply be an error in the Jepp production.
The only sure way to find out for sure is to ask Jeppesen about it.