Bad adventures
your right there is often a lot of crap on here from time to time and it is humourous. The facts are what is a concern.
Fact, an FAAA senior official worked the day after a long london trip. Fact this occurred the same day as a National UNION ORGANISED protest march.
Fact, the fatigue study was based on a computer model, Not on assessing actual QF LH cabin crew on actual trips.
Fact, gaurdian behaves like rumplestiltskin frothing at the mouth at any who dare criticise.
Fact, guardian a senior officail condones crew breaching MBT because others have done it.
Bad adventures, you may laugh but these issues are no joking matter.
Your attempt to redirect the readers about who is and isnt former officials is pathetic.Its also irrelevant.
Whats relevant are the FACTs. The only ones laughing are our fellow unions and the Company. The Company officials will have a very difficult time holding a straight face the next time any official raises the issue of OH&S and arduous duties after what has been condoned on here. You may well laugh BAD or is it Guardian ( as stated earlier its irrelevant whom ever you area) but crew reading this around the world are shaking their heads in disbelief.
Thanks for setting and upholding a standard that gives us some cred when we have OH& S discussions with the Company - NOT!
The hole you officials have dug on here in the past few days is one you will never be able to climb out of with your integrity or credibilty intact.