helmet fire
Thankyou helmet
Yes, your ideas and peer review is what I am referring to. I don't want to go too deep on a goss network but they could operate in a similar fashion as the rules for senate committees.
They could even be a statutory board of review with enough encumbants to ensure supply all over the country. After all with the environmentalists ranting of late on their pet hobbies it is indeed a rare govt minister that does not place such a vehicle between himself and the public. (protection)
Objective wish lists for site data is also wanting. E.G. One from personal experience years ago; Q. Are you sure that the T/R gearbox was not seizing up to cause the RPM loss which led to overpitching? A. Duh- didn't look at the T/R Gearbox! Both investigators were qualified engineers, not drivers.
Not criticising them, but the lack of a sound system let them down. Even so one has to often look at something for long periods of time to allow your different experiences to examine just what it is you are looking at, but one thing is paramount, all data must be recorded and objectively recorded if you don't want to be cracked off later.
TET