Sorry, just can't agree that there is no place for EOL's in PPL(H) syllabus. (and as an aside since someone has mentioned it already, I also don't agree that spin-training has no place in PPL(A) training).
Whilst I do concur that recovery of the machine to a hover or slow speed level at 8 feet is going to likely result in a non-fatal arrival, why should PPL students not be taught EOL's properly? Granted perhaps an EOL in an R22 in nil wind is not the right time to be flying the exercise, but select your conditions and landing area - ought not the student be taught to get the flare / level / lower co-ordination correct. Just because it is hard doesn't mean it ought not to be taught even if the instructor is following through, helping correct on the controls or fine tune the technique etc. I reckon few PPL students are going to get it right simply by following through.
Spining fixed wing likewise. Recovery from incipient spin is taught. Fine. But what if through gash handling or whatever, a pilot not taught how to recover from a spin, finds himself in one. Surely it is better for him to have experienced what can be very disorientating in a controlled environment before having to deal with it in an uncontrolled environment?
I can't argue that accidents from practice EOL's will not result. But since EOL's are something many pilots will have to deal with in reality, why not give them at least some prior experience of actually landing one so that they have a chance of not wrecking their or someone else's machine should it actually occur. And experience of it reduces the fear of it - fixed wing spinning is a classic example.