Originally Posted by Black Knat
Must say, load of rubbish but out of interest, how did the reporters get the cameras on board? Any suggestions?
Well it wasn't all rubbish was it? There was (i) The apparent faking of references; (ii) The claim that the pax in 1A would die; (iii) The non-reporting of possible safety-breaches.
I'm not saying these were all proved but could we agree there were some question marks and possible isolted incidents?
Anyway - to answer your question, have a look at sites like this one:
http://www.lorraine.co.uk/video_surv...le_systems.asp
The video equipment is about the 3rd or 4th item down.