Mind you... in the last but one edition of "Transmit" the Chairman wrote that GATCO had contact SRG and "represented the Guild' views... " on the use of military airfields by civilian aircraft. Despite an invitation to explain what these "views" were nothing has been forthcoming; and I suspect the views may not be those held by the military proportion of the membership?
RNGrommits... you have a point, but membership isn't compulsory and I suspect many of us join for our own reasons. If you feel the military isn't adequately represented (despite Flower's post... Hi Flower, long time no see!)... Why not put yourself forward for election (heck it'd look good on your OJAR)?