Scroggs, thanks for stopping me going mad. I was talking about a light twin before getting airborne as you probably already knew. I seriously was starting to doubt my knowledge there for a second.
Ali and LST. Wasnt questioning you, just trying to gain further insight. The multi types I have been flying certainly wouldnt work very well if what was quoted in the book was what I would have to do for real. I agree with what you both say.
Dusty B. I am referring to the airflow over the wing (by saying molecules I could well be/probably am wrong). Please take what i said with a pinch of salt.
All of those other people out there. This book isnt complete crap although as has been proved, some of the stuff in there isnt totally accurate. It is good for reminding you what you already know. Particularly when it comes to relating questions to each other.
To give it (and the author) some credit. It has obviously helped a few of us get through interviews! On the other side. There is a box on the 4th page that says the authors do not "gaurantee the accuracy or completeness of the information". For the record, I would reccomend people to buy it.