Hi all.......it's quite admirable for the likes of HO and Co who are not affected by the slide in seniority numbers to raise this issue, i myself have slipped back 20 numbers because of this last ammendment not sure if there are more to come (one can only hope not)......,Its been interesting reading the posts as everyone has there own "subjective" take on what constitutes date of joining and whether or not the cadet scheme falls within that...being only relatively new to the company I lack the necessary background information behind LOA 161....i guess what we are all seeking is a fair outcome for all.Unfortunately i believe that wont happen in this case ...some will win and some will lose...i have accepted the fact that in this instance I've drawn the short end of the stick.
HD.