PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Reading "Approved" back
View Single Post
Old 4th Jan 2006, 10:18
  #14 (permalink)  
bookworm
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Reading "Approved" back

Fair points JEP.

Originally Posted by JEP
The read back
"Fastair 345 wilco"
looks incorrect to be, as is should be
"Wilco, Fastair 345"

Doc 9432 is from 1990 and a I think a lot has changed since then.
That's true. The convention (which I think is adopted in the UK's CAP413 RT manual now) of where to put the callsign is relatively recent, not very uniformly adopted, and in some cases a bit arbitrary. Despite the idea that a strict adherence to the convention might address the issue I raise, I still think that on balance it is better to avoid readback of reporting instructions.

Originally Posted by JEP
When a distress situation is over i.e. you engine has resumed running, do you use:
"Cancel Mayday" or "Cancel Distress". ??

We are told that "Cancel Mayday" is a big NO NO.
I've never actually had to cancel one, so I can't remember, but I think the point is a good one (in the same way that "departure" is used for "take-off" to avoid any ambiguity).
bookworm is offline