PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - QANTAS discussions (All Bases) - Merged
View Single Post
Old 12th Dec 2005, 23:32
  #661 (permalink)  
Eden99
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MELBOURNE
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Front Pit

Most crew are voting YES for the dispensation because they understand that it is about protecting our flying.

Of course the FAAA is not going to distribute a NO case. How silly would that be. Are you suggesting Mike Mijatov who is supporting a YES vote to keep all of our jobs would then sit down and write up a NO case when the FAAA knows that would be detrimental to all of our jobs?

And a NO case would be the crap that is being written by people like lowerlobe and you, Front Pit........ all factually incorrect and based on no sense at all.

Those who believe in a NO case should do what Mijatov did in 2003 over EBA6...... GO OUT WRITE A CONVINCING CASE, USE YOUR OWN MONEY , TIME AND RESOURCES AND ABOVE ALL ATTACH YOUR NAMES TO IT!

Of course none of you suggesting a NO case will do that, because you would then be identified as the morons you are and when it all went wrong if crew listened to you, you would be held responsible.
Eden99 is offline