New Evidence
Can I again point out that it is not a question of new evidence it is a question of the MOD (and the BoI process) failing to make use of the evidence they have, not asking the obvious questions and not considering major areas such as airworthiness and fitness for purpose. They also happily allow the Reviewing Officers to ignore the requirements of AP3207 and even the "requirements" of the Senior Reviewing Officer's own flight safety directive issued just weeks before the findings of Gross Negligence. I suggest that these are the areas that need to be "attacked" so that MOD cannot keep sheltering behind the "new" evidence response.