"However, given all that, if this report is actually being used by some to blame the inspector for this accident then that is also wrong since it's absolutely clear from the report that there was a long chain of events here (as in almost all air accidents)."
The only blame so far arising from the long chain of events leading to this tragic accident has fallen upon the inspector. He has been charged with manslaughter and is currently on bail.
As far as I am aware no other action is being taken, except for the inevitable tightening of procedures, as recommended.
I feel inherently uncomfortable that a man who chooses to voluntary help a friend do some work on his aircraft, for no charge, ends up with his life in tatters. All is not quite so clear-cut as the report makes out, which further complicates the issue of blame.
Even if found innocent he will still have to bear the burden of the loss of life of a friend and that of an innocent passenger. He also has to bear the very considerable financial costs from legal representation, whatever the outcome. I understand that the BMAA do not provide financial assistance for their volunteers. Perhaps the PFA and BGA are the same; all are reliant upon volunteers, I understand.
Whether this is right and proper is a matter for others to consider and decide, but I cannot help but feel that it undermines the future viability of any BMAA, PFA or BGA voluntary posts that carry any airworthiness responsibility.
VP
Last edited by VP959; 20th November 2005 at 14:26.