Creampuff, I feel that section 197 of the act would be the most applicable to an interference of this nature.
By your last pragraph to me I can see where you are leading, however
(my interpretation) of this second radio call to lambast the originator of the first for such a long-winded tx in itself is self-defeating (had such an incident happened or not is not really important here), and effectively serves no real purpose but to satisfy the ego of the agitator and perhaps compromise the actual safety of the pilot and his/her pax (due to his/her being disturbed from normal ops).
That situation I would then be led to believe would then be punishable under the CAR's and the Act as an act of unlawful interference to a flight, would it not
[ 23 January 2002: Message edited by: 429 CJ ]</p>