Exactly! The definition is rubbish, especially when applied in my context... define normal flight.... It's completely ludicrous.
The 30/60 is interesting... didn't know about the parachute thing, but suppose it makes sense.
My point is, however: is there a legal precedent for an angle of bank which is considered to be the limit of acceptable "normal" flight? Or is it just left to argue ones case?
Also, would a 60 AOB "wingover" albeit not actually a wingover being at 60 AOB, be an aerobatic manoeuvre?