I don't see any attempt to prevent discussion of the matter, but I do see someone who's made fairly wild assumptions and got on his high horse before he knows the facts of the matter - while knowing that I was in the process of trying to discover and deliver a reasonable, and reasonably authorititive, answer to the question posed by Studebaker.
Signeti, I suggest you go back and read this topic through again (remembering to include your deleted post), and then ask yourself who and what is worthy of criticism here.
Scroggs