…if the "safety case" they have finally published…
The point is, this is an "extract" of the safety case; why are parts of a "public document" being hidden from the public? What’s in it that is worth hiding? The model has changed heaps in 12 months; yet the original ‘safety’ document is the primary (joke) reference.
If this document supported anti-NAS sentiments (such as the previous rollback) the terry towelled hat wearing folk would be shouting from the roof tops about being accountable; shouting down statistics and assumption, constructing various documentation, authored by various experts, quoting flaws in stats and assumptions.
This is why those on the pro-NAS side of the argument fall down; sh!t can everything that doesn’t go their way, then say nothing when they have an opportunity to slip something through.
My information is the minister is going to make the call on whether it will go ahead; there are two charting options printed…