For the record and lest some of the conspiracy brigade don their tin foil hats, the following comment by
Creampuff should not be construed in any other way than intended.
I was surprised to note the real name of Mr Y (which, like that of Mr X, is stated in the publicly- available judgment) is identical to that of a current director of an organisation which claims to represent the interests of pilots and aircraft owners. Are Mr Y and that director one and the same?
A reading of the entire transcript will show that Mr Y, in the judges opinion acquitted himself such that
Accordingly, unless otherwise indicated, I accept the versions of conversations adduced in evidence by Messrs A, B and Y where
those versions differ from the evidence given by Messrs X and Z.