Too stubborn 4 me. I just don't want to add more.
(But:
1. I know the original test pilot, I know what the program, I know what these machines do.
2.If they were going to break in the way you suggest then there would be evidence of it and there is not.
3. If misrigging were a problem ... no evidence.
4.You don't seem to be able to acknowledge anything positive about what is a brilliant design in so many ways (can you name ANY?)(even if you did leave 'that' out) )
You are unreasonable!
And WRONG:
THERE IS NO SUCH LIMITATION ON THE ROBINSON
So it just COULD NOT have been the FAA who put it there because it's NOT THERE!
Please don't reply unless you can correct at least some of your errors - or just agree with anything I have said - if it's embarrasing do it privately -email.
Thanks for the support of even some 'anti's.
I want to stop this (now) pointless debate .... but I'm suffering from lastworditis.
Or let's just agree to disagree ..and be friends .. heh?
In good humor