As an unbiased observer with no prejudice towards either side, I think it is obvious which side of the argument has presented the best case. I have flown the R-22 and personally do not have any interest in flying one ever again. Having read all the postings thoroughly with great interest curious to see if this silly little helicopter should have its certification removed, I think the clear answer is -- NO.
Both sides have done an excellent job in defining and defending their points of view, but Joe Pilot has shown a greater degree of first hand knowledge, and more accurate analysis of the accident statistics.
Congratulations to both sides on an excellent job in presenting your case. The discussion has gotten down to a re-hash of counter and counter-counter points that are now becoming a little repetitious, but I can understand that each side has worked hard to present their side, and neither wants to let up. It may be time to put this one to rest for now. By all means you should certainly carry on if you feel the need, but the fellow readers I’ve spoken with all share the opinion that you’ve each accomplished what you intended to. Thanks again to both of you and to all others that contributed.
[This message has been edited by HeliFlight (edited 28 September 2000).]