Is the glass half full, or half empty?
Lu will argue both depending on who asked the question.
Lu, you just have to get over this and get on with your life. Just because there are people out there who know more than you about helicopters, you have to take on the system in an attempt to prove them wrong, not because the concept is wrong, but because they told you you were wrong. One day you are telling NL that the S76 had a casting problem in the gearbox,he says you don't know what youre talking about, and you have the gall to believe the rumour you heard from the bloke who ran the canteen!(or wherever you heard it) he test flew the bloody thing Lu, not you. You try and convince everyone that Frank Robinson has deliberately covered up the design of the R22 rotorhead, and that Frank Robinson designed that head wrong. I doubt youve even flown in one let alone fixed one.
About ten years ago I had to ask Aerospatiale about a query on their 365, I got two answers from two different people, both answers different, who did they go to for the correct answer? The test pilot.
Now im not saying theyre always right, but they try to be as close to right as their machine tells them by the data they bring back.
I don't know Nick Lappos, but his credentials are on the board and his experience says alot. Hes posted a few responses where hes said hes wrong, you rarely admit your wrong and then start the argument again in another post.
I don't tell you how to fix helicopters, don't tell engineers you know more about physics, then run off until you find someone who will agree with you or in part qualify some point youre raising.
I view your last post as being nothing but attempting to provoke argument and attempt to embarras NL.
Ive had an absolute gutful of your crap Lu, you hijack posts with your crap, and get everyone off the track of the original post.
My spellcheck works, but this ones for you Lu, antidisestablishmentarianism.
