alf5071h when evidence of a (very) long t/d for AF658 became clear, I started to suspect some "press-on-itis" at work. The cell(s) to the W. might have been one factor, but has their fuel status been established (I may have missed it) ?
I believe the CVR contains earlier discussion of diverting to YOW - which they eschewed - so is it possible the prospect of a go around to another hold or else reneging on the decision not to divert might have trapped them into a
got to make this one work mindset ?
I've been there
