PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 'N' reg UK owners beware!
View Single Post
Old 10th August 2005 | 15:25
  #27 (permalink)  
IO540
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
In that case the IOM would be doing exactly what the Caymans (e.g.) do; accepting FAA licenses ratings.

This would be a move forward for people unable to do the JAA IR but would not address the proposed residence limit for N-reg planes. Moving UK's N fleet to G (or to any EASA member state CofA regime such as M) would be a hugely expensive and complicated task in most cases, and impossible in many cases.

I am not sure how one can maintain an aircraft to EASA requirements if the aircraft or any part of it is not EASA approved.

Therefore I don't see how any registry that requires EASA maintenance would help - except to future FAA IR holders. And to be honest the DfT's objective of scaring the living daylights out of anyone wishing to do the FAA IR and go N in the UK is certainly working already!

It would also mean that anyone on the M register would need the same CAA medical as a JAA IR (PPL/IR or CPL/IR) requires e.g. the same pointless JAA audiogram requirement even for a privately flying PPL.

Funnily enough, the people that put a plane on the Cayman register are CAA-employed inspectors... Do they inspect to FAA standards, or CAA standards? Can you put a SR22 or TBM700C2 on the Cayman reg? (forgetting for now that the Cayman reg doesn't want SEPs)
IO540 is offline